Satire in The Prologue
Satire is a genre of literature
in which vices, follies, abuses, and shortcomings are held up to ridicule,
ideally with the intent of shaming individuals, corporations, government or
society itself, into improvement. Although satire is usually meant to be
humorous, its greater purpose is often constructive social criticism, using wit
as a weapon and as a tool to draw attention to both particular and wider issues
in society. Satire differs from humour in that it has a definite moral purpose.
The satirist deliberately alienates our sympathies from those whom he
describes, and as the true humorist is apt to pass from comedy to romance, and
from romance to tragedy, so the satirist not infrequently ends by finding rage and
disgust overpower his sense of the ridiculous. The fact is that satire is not
Chaucer's natural bent. His interest lies in portraiture rather than in
exposure. His object is to point life as he sees it, to hold up the mirror to
nature.
Chaucer's kinship as a satirist
is with Fielding. They are alike in a certain air of rollicking good-fellowship
and a determination to paint men and women as they know them. Both enjoy a
rough prank, and have little patience with over-refinement. Both give the
readers a sense of studies honesty and kindliness, and know how to combine
tenderness with strength. Both with all their tolerance, have a keen eye for
hypocrisy or affectation and a sharp tongue wherewith to chastise and expose
it. Chaucer hates no one, not even the Pardoner.
In Chaucer we have no sustained
satire of the Popean or the Swiftean type. His genius is like that of
Shakespeare, having a high degree of negative capability. Hence, Chaucer gives
us no impression of being a great satirist, although in his writings especially
in the portraits of the Prologue we have sharp little sallies of satire. It
would be rather more suitable to call Chaucer a comic satirist in relation to
his Prologue to the Canterbury Tales. Comic satire predominates in
extraordinarily rich Prologue.
There are, therefore, certain
limitations of scope. The higher aristocracy are excluded, for the Knight is
comparatively low ranking, and is in any case an ideal figure. The painfulness
and rough comedy of the life of the great mass of the really poor find no
place, and again their two representatives are idealized portraits. The
characters of highest and lowest ranks were not suitable for comic treatment.
In the Prologue we mainly see the middling people, and we see them through
Chaucer's eyes from a slightly superior moral and social station. We can afford
to laugh at them.
We look through the eyes of a
poet masculine, self-assured, delighted, who knows that there is , joy
after woe, and after joy, sadness. He sees abuses but is neither surprised nor
stung by them. Men are not angels, but neither are they devils. Chaucer gives
us a vision of men and women in the world, and most of them have some relish of
absurdity when looked at carefully especially when they require neither our
loyalty nor our fear.
Chaucer does not see his company
of pilgrims simply as an incongruous assortment of pantomime figures, to be
enjoyed for their grotesquely comic oddity. The pervasive element of social
satire in the General Prologue most prominent in his account of the
ecclesiastical figures suggests Chaucer's serious concern at the debasing of
moral standards. There are moments, as when he records the Friar's sneering
contempt for the poor, which seem to show Chaucer's habitual good temper
revolting against the cynical opportunism which had become widespread in
ecclesiastical life. His usual attitude towards the moral weakness which he
discloses is one of mocking. The Shipman is a thievish pirate, the Reeve a
cunning embezzler, the Physician has a dishonest private understanding with his
druggist, and the Man of Law 'semed bisier than he was'.
The efforts of the Prioress to
mimic courtly manners are detected and set down with the same intuitive sense
of false appearance as allows Chaucer to penetrate the Merchant's imposing
disguise. The mask of respectability is not roughly torn off, for while he is
describing his pilgrims Chaucer is maintaining an outward manner that is awed
and deferential; telling us that the Prioress was 'of greet desport', that the
Monk was a manly man, 'to been an abbot able', or that the murderous Shipman
was an incomparable navigator and pilot.
Because he does not insist upon
their moral failings or hypocritical nature, revealing them with an ironic
innocence of manner and leaving them to speak for themselves, Chaucer's
approach to his pilgrims suggests a psychologist rather than a moralist' He
presents vices and shortcomings within the context of human individuality, as a
product of the curious pressures which stamp a unique personality upon each of
the pilgrims. The Shipman's easy conscience is an integral part of the tough,
self-reliant spirit of the man, which has acquired the wilfulness and moral
unconcern of the elements in which he lives. His thefts and murders, Franklin's Epicureanism, the Physician's avarice, interest Chaucer not as
evidence of a breakdown of moral values but for what they reveal of individual
character.
Thus Chaucer's satire is not
directed against contemporary morals, but against the comic self-ignorance which
gives man two' identities the creature he is, and the more distinguished and
inscrutable person he imagines himself to be.
Disclaimer
This website is designed to provide free notes and study materials on English Literature. The prime aim is to help financially weaker students with their ready references. Since a lot of different content writers write and contribute articles for this website, it’s quite tough to check and verify the originality and uniqueness of the content. There may be a few contents which are directly or indirectly copied/ plagiarized from other websites/ books/ journals etc. If such type of issues is noticed please don’t forget to inform us. We will immediately remove the content from our website www.engliterature.com. Our mailing address is admin@engliterature.com
إرسال تعليق
Don't spam comments